(versi Bahasa Malaysia di akhir artikel ini)
1. There has been a lot of talk about a Social Contract in Malaysia.
2. Perhaps it would be useful if we understand this concept a little bit more before we argue about it.
3. If we care to look into the origins of the social contract we will find that it is a European concept enunciated by European philosophers. The most famous is Socrates, the Greek philosopher who was jailed and sentenced to death.
1. There has been a lot of talk about a Social Contract in Malaysia.
2. Perhaps it would be useful if we understand this concept a little bit more before we argue about it.
3. If we care to look into the origins of the social contract we will find that it is a European concept enunciated by European philosophers. The most famous is Socrates, the Greek philosopher who was jailed and sentenced to death.
4. He refused to escape and migrate to another Greek city-state because he believed he was bound by a social contract to live by the laws of his state of Athens as he was born and brought up there, benefiting from the aforesaid laws.
5. Before this social contract, men were said to live in a State of Nature, where there was no law to govern the relation between individuals in a small primitive society. The law of the jungle prevailed where might was right.
6. As society grew it became necessary to have laws which govern the behaviour of members of the society. All citizens were committed to respect and submit to the laws. This understanding is in fact a social contract although there was no oral or written undertaking to respect and submit to the laws. This was the view of Socrates. Later philosophers enlarged on this concept but there was never a requirement for a formal contract.
7. The Greeks are said to practise a democratic form of Government. However the citizen who had the right to participate in Government were limited to male adults of sound mind. Women, children, slaves, captives, criminals and foreigners were not accorded the rights of citizens and could not play a part in Government.
8. Much of European civilisation is based on the Greek civilisation. But as society grew bigger, direct participation in Government by the people became impossible.
9. At one stage democracy was abandoned in favour of feudalism in which a monarch ruled by Divine Right. In Asia this had always been the form of Government. Nevertheless the submission of the subjects to the Monarch was also a form of social contract.
10. Later feudalism was replaced by republicanism i.e. a return to the public of the power of Government.
11. Numerous forms of republics have emerged, each with its own set of laws and rules regarding the government of the country. But whatever may be the form, the laws and the rules, the citizens are bound by them. There would be no written contract but for foreigners to accept the rights of citizenship, there would usually be a formal undertaking to submit to the laws and system of the Government of the country.
12. After becoming citizens their offspring would automatically be regarded as citizens and as citizens they need not swear a formal oath of allegiance to the country. This right is through jus sanguinis i.e. through blood relation.
13. But there can also be citizenship by being born in the country or jus soli. This can be provided for by the laws of the country.
14. But whether citizenship is gained through jus sanguinis or jus soli, the social contract still applies even though there is no formal oath taking.
15. What is clear is that a social contract is a general understanding on the part of a citizen to submit to and obey the laws and the institutions of the country. The social contract governs not just his relation with the country, its Government and its institutions but also his relationship with his fellow citizens.
16. After receiving comments on this I will talk about the Malaysian social contract and its effect on Malaysia.
KONTRAK SOSIAL
1. Banyak yang diperkatakan berkenaan Kontrak Sosial di Malaysia
2. Mungkin ada baiknya kita cuba faham akan konsep ini sebelum kita berbahas dengan lebih lanjut.
3. Jika kita kaji asal usul kontrak sosial kita akan dapati bahawa ianya adalah satu konsep bangsa Eropah yang diketengahkan para falsafah Eropah. Yang termasyhur adalah Socrates, ahli falsafah berbangsa Greek yang telah dipenjarakan dan disabitkan hukuman bunuh.
4. Beliau enggan lari dan berhijrah ke bandar Greek yang lain kerana beliau percaya bahawa ia terikat dengan kontrak sosial untuk hidup berlandaskan undang-undang Athens di mana dianya dilahir dan dibesarkan dan mendapat manfaat daripada undang-undang tersebut.
5. Sebelum adanya kontrak sosial ini, manusia dikatakan hidup di dalam Keadaan Semulajadi, dimana tidak ada undang-undang untuk mentadbir perhubungan antara individu dalam masyarakat primitif yang kecil. Yang ada hanyalah undang-undang "belantara" dimana yang kuat selalunya benar.
6. Apabila masyarakat berkembang terdapat keperluan undang-undang bagi mentadbir perilaku sesuatu masyarakat. Setiap warganegara komited terhadap perlunya hormat dan akur pada undang-undang. Pemahaman ini merupakan kontrak sosial walaupun tidak terdapat apa-apa pengakuan untuk hormat dan akur terhadap undang-undang secara lisan mahupun bertulis. Ini pandangan Socrates. Para falsafah selepasnya memperluaskan konsep ini tetapi tidak pernah ada keperluan untuk kontrak secara formal.
7. Bangsa Greek dikatakan mengamalkan bentuk Kerajaan demokratik. Tetapi rakyat yang behak menyertai Kerajaan dihadkan kepada lelaki dewasa yang waras. Wanita, kanak-kanak, hamba abdi, tahanan, penjenayah dan warga asing tidak diberi hak sebagai warganegara dan tidak boleh memain peranan dalam kerajaan.
8. Sebahagian besar tamadun Eropah berasas kepada tamadun Greek. Tetapi apabila masyarakat berkembang besar adalah mustahil untuk mereka membuat penyertaan secara langsung didalam Kerajaan.
9. Pada satu peringkat, demokrasi ditolak dan sistem feudal diterima di mana raja memerintah dengan penuh hak ketuhanan. Ini merupakan bentuk Kerajaan yang terdapat di Asia. Bagaimanapun, ketaatan rakyat kepada Raja juga merupaka satu bentuk kontrak sosial.
10. Kemudian feudalisme digantikan dengan sistem republik iaitu mengembalikan kepada rakyat kuasa Kerajaan.
11. Pelbagai bentuk republik telah wujud, setiap satunya dengan undang-undang dan peraturannya tersendiri berkenaan kerajaan Negara tersebut. Walau apa pun bentuknya, undang-undang dan peraturan-peraturan, setiap warganegara terikat dengannya. Tidak ada kontrak bertulis tetapi bagi orang asing yang menerima hak warganegara, pada lazimnya akan ada perakuan formal untuk menturuti sistem dan undang-undang Kerajaan Negara itu.
12. Selepas menjadi warganegara, anak mereka akan secara automatik dianggap sebagai warganegara dan sebagai warganegara mereka tidak perlu bersumpah kesetiaan kepada Negara berkenaan secara formal. Hak ini adalah melalui jus sanguinis, iaitu melalui pertalian darah.
13. Kewarganegaraan juga boleh diperolehi dengan cara dilahirkan didalam Negara itu atau jus soli. Ini boleh disediakan oleh undang-undang Negara itu.
14. Samada kewarganegaraan diperolehi melalui jus sanguinis atau jus soli, kontrak sosial masih diguna pakai walaupun tiada pengakuan sumpah secara formal.
15. Yang jelas, kontrak sosial adalah kefahaman secara umum seseorang warganegara untuk menghormati dan akur kepada undang-undang dan institusi sesebuah negara. Kontrak Sosial ini tidak terhad kepada mengurus perhubungannya dengan negara, Kerajaan dan institusi, tetapi juga perhubungannya dengan rakan senegaranya yang lain.
16. Saya akan menulis berkenaan kontrak sosial dan kesannya terhadap Malaysia selepas menerima komen terhadap rencana saya yang ini.
5. Before this social contract, men were said to live in a State of Nature, where there was no law to govern the relation between individuals in a small primitive society. The law of the jungle prevailed where might was right.
6. As society grew it became necessary to have laws which govern the behaviour of members of the society. All citizens were committed to respect and submit to the laws. This understanding is in fact a social contract although there was no oral or written undertaking to respect and submit to the laws. This was the view of Socrates. Later philosophers enlarged on this concept but there was never a requirement for a formal contract.
7. The Greeks are said to practise a democratic form of Government. However the citizen who had the right to participate in Government were limited to male adults of sound mind. Women, children, slaves, captives, criminals and foreigners were not accorded the rights of citizens and could not play a part in Government.
8. Much of European civilisation is based on the Greek civilisation. But as society grew bigger, direct participation in Government by the people became impossible.
9. At one stage democracy was abandoned in favour of feudalism in which a monarch ruled by Divine Right. In Asia this had always been the form of Government. Nevertheless the submission of the subjects to the Monarch was also a form of social contract.
10. Later feudalism was replaced by republicanism i.e. a return to the public of the power of Government.
11. Numerous forms of republics have emerged, each with its own set of laws and rules regarding the government of the country. But whatever may be the form, the laws and the rules, the citizens are bound by them. There would be no written contract but for foreigners to accept the rights of citizenship, there would usually be a formal undertaking to submit to the laws and system of the Government of the country.
12. After becoming citizens their offspring would automatically be regarded as citizens and as citizens they need not swear a formal oath of allegiance to the country. This right is through jus sanguinis i.e. through blood relation.
13. But there can also be citizenship by being born in the country or jus soli. This can be provided for by the laws of the country.
14. But whether citizenship is gained through jus sanguinis or jus soli, the social contract still applies even though there is no formal oath taking.
15. What is clear is that a social contract is a general understanding on the part of a citizen to submit to and obey the laws and the institutions of the country. The social contract governs not just his relation with the country, its Government and its institutions but also his relationship with his fellow citizens.
16. After receiving comments on this I will talk about the Malaysian social contract and its effect on Malaysia.
*****
KONTRAK SOSIAL
1. Banyak yang diperkatakan berkenaan Kontrak Sosial di Malaysia
2. Mungkin ada baiknya kita cuba faham akan konsep ini sebelum kita berbahas dengan lebih lanjut.
3. Jika kita kaji asal usul kontrak sosial kita akan dapati bahawa ianya adalah satu konsep bangsa Eropah yang diketengahkan para falsafah Eropah. Yang termasyhur adalah Socrates, ahli falsafah berbangsa Greek yang telah dipenjarakan dan disabitkan hukuman bunuh.
4. Beliau enggan lari dan berhijrah ke bandar Greek yang lain kerana beliau percaya bahawa ia terikat dengan kontrak sosial untuk hidup berlandaskan undang-undang Athens di mana dianya dilahir dan dibesarkan dan mendapat manfaat daripada undang-undang tersebut.
5. Sebelum adanya kontrak sosial ini, manusia dikatakan hidup di dalam Keadaan Semulajadi, dimana tidak ada undang-undang untuk mentadbir perhubungan antara individu dalam masyarakat primitif yang kecil. Yang ada hanyalah undang-undang "belantara" dimana yang kuat selalunya benar.
6. Apabila masyarakat berkembang terdapat keperluan undang-undang bagi mentadbir perilaku sesuatu masyarakat. Setiap warganegara komited terhadap perlunya hormat dan akur pada undang-undang. Pemahaman ini merupakan kontrak sosial walaupun tidak terdapat apa-apa pengakuan untuk hormat dan akur terhadap undang-undang secara lisan mahupun bertulis. Ini pandangan Socrates. Para falsafah selepasnya memperluaskan konsep ini tetapi tidak pernah ada keperluan untuk kontrak secara formal.
7. Bangsa Greek dikatakan mengamalkan bentuk Kerajaan demokratik. Tetapi rakyat yang behak menyertai Kerajaan dihadkan kepada lelaki dewasa yang waras. Wanita, kanak-kanak, hamba abdi, tahanan, penjenayah dan warga asing tidak diberi hak sebagai warganegara dan tidak boleh memain peranan dalam kerajaan.
8. Sebahagian besar tamadun Eropah berasas kepada tamadun Greek. Tetapi apabila masyarakat berkembang besar adalah mustahil untuk mereka membuat penyertaan secara langsung didalam Kerajaan.
9. Pada satu peringkat, demokrasi ditolak dan sistem feudal diterima di mana raja memerintah dengan penuh hak ketuhanan. Ini merupakan bentuk Kerajaan yang terdapat di Asia. Bagaimanapun, ketaatan rakyat kepada Raja juga merupaka satu bentuk kontrak sosial.
10. Kemudian feudalisme digantikan dengan sistem republik iaitu mengembalikan kepada rakyat kuasa Kerajaan.
11. Pelbagai bentuk republik telah wujud, setiap satunya dengan undang-undang dan peraturannya tersendiri berkenaan kerajaan Negara tersebut. Walau apa pun bentuknya, undang-undang dan peraturan-peraturan, setiap warganegara terikat dengannya. Tidak ada kontrak bertulis tetapi bagi orang asing yang menerima hak warganegara, pada lazimnya akan ada perakuan formal untuk menturuti sistem dan undang-undang Kerajaan Negara itu.
12. Selepas menjadi warganegara, anak mereka akan secara automatik dianggap sebagai warganegara dan sebagai warganegara mereka tidak perlu bersumpah kesetiaan kepada Negara berkenaan secara formal. Hak ini adalah melalui jus sanguinis, iaitu melalui pertalian darah.
13. Kewarganegaraan juga boleh diperolehi dengan cara dilahirkan didalam Negara itu atau jus soli. Ini boleh disediakan oleh undang-undang Negara itu.
14. Samada kewarganegaraan diperolehi melalui jus sanguinis atau jus soli, kontrak sosial masih diguna pakai walaupun tiada pengakuan sumpah secara formal.
15. Yang jelas, kontrak sosial adalah kefahaman secara umum seseorang warganegara untuk menghormati dan akur kepada undang-undang dan institusi sesebuah negara. Kontrak Sosial ini tidak terhad kepada mengurus perhubungannya dengan negara, Kerajaan dan institusi, tetapi juga perhubungannya dengan rakan senegaranya yang lain.
16. Saya akan menulis berkenaan kontrak sosial dan kesannya terhadap Malaysia selepas menerima komen terhadap rencana saya yang ini.
Tu la paklah semalam cakap tak serupa bikin kat TV... perhh... apa nak jadi... tup..tup..semua isu semasa kat malaysia ni beralih pada kes Anuar... Hmm memang macam ni politik di malaysia kan... hmmm.. SO esok jadi ka kibar bendera putih ni? sapa nak mula?
Tun dan semua bloggers,
Saya ada menulis artikel tentang tuduhan liwat ke atas Anwar Ibrahim.
Sila berkunjung ke sana untuk berkongsi pendapat.
Dearest Tun
Kempen Ribbon PUTIH
Sokong Tun
Semoga Tun sentiasa sehat walafiat disamping keluarga dan teman.
Tun,
Why now did the concern and noise about Social Contract ???
Is there really a gimmick by the Bar Council or someone to try to make a ruckus in the country?
Is this one kind of political ploy?
Tun
Go Tun Go Tun...
We are very keen to know about this topic as youngster maybe we don't understand...
TQ
hmm... manusia masing2 dah jadi pelupa yang kronik....lupa pada Tuhan..
Y.A.Bhg Tun,
Contract doesn't mean has to be written. Only people who are not civilised will not accept their verbal contract. (Abdullah included when he said there's no Gentleman Agreement to be only One Term PM).
Just like uncivilised Bar Council of Malaysia whom recently held forum to discuss whether there is or there is no social contract and requested them to be shown a written copy.
This Bar Council should be disbanded and dissolved because the Bar Council doesn't has any role or place in the Constitution of Malaysia. Just a group of people legally form their group to seeking just their cause.
ASSALAMUALAIKUM,
ALHAMDULILLAH. DAPAT JUGA MEMBACA TULISAN TUN PADA HARI INI.
INI LAH BUKTINYA PEMIMPIN YANG GEMAR MEMBACA. SEGALA PERSOALAN DAPAT DIJELASKAN DENGAN BEGITU AKADEMIK SEKALI.
PENJELASAN YANG JELAS MENGENAI ASAL USUL SOCIAL CONTRACT.
TERIMA KASIH TUN
P/S:- ENTAH ADA LAGI KER PEMIMPIN YANG GEMAR MEMBACA SEKARANG NI?? YANG GEMAR TIDUR MERATA-RATA TEMPAT SAYA TAU LAH... HEHEHEHE...
P/S:- YANG SAYA INGAT SOCIAL KONTRAK NEGARA KITA ADALAH BERDASARKAN PRINSIP "JUS SOLI"... ingat lah sikit2 masa belajar sejarah dulu. tapi malas membaca dan tak ada minat jadi pemimpin negara.
The social contract in Malaysia is achieved by our forefathers
for an independent Malaysia.The Malays as the native population have tolerated some privilages for the formation of this social contract.
But maybe the argument is about the other races who being born in this country or 'jus soli'.They might reason that since they are born in Malaysia, they too should have the same rights as the malays.How to address this?
Tun, tq for the latest info...
Tun, I need your views about the latest issues...anwar, liwat and kedudukan najib...any ideas Tun
Tun ：
Memandangkan social contract ini cuma mainan orang politik membohongi rakyat, contohnya cukup jelas, dengan adanya social contract, maka Umnoputra mempunyai peluang untuk mengautkan, apakah social contract ini?
Habis habis Tun menggunakan social contract untuk mengujudkan sentiment perkauman, katanya ketuanan Melayu, Hak bumiputra... 30% dan pelbagai dasar yang menghancurkan keharmonian, perpaduan nasional.
Tun, social contract yang Tun laksanakan cumalah cara menipu orang Melayu, menjadikan Melayu hidup sehinnga mengenang budi Tun sahaja.
Kesimpulannya, social contract Tun itu cumalah macam roti canai campur bawang, cili dan telur, rasanya amat berbeza, cuma memperindahkan rasanya, tapi roti canai apa bentuk pun mesti guna tupung gandum, kena uli uli hingga jadi ketul ketul.
siapa nak marah atas pendapat saya, datang lah sini, jangan buat kotor blog Tun..ok?
www.antimahathir.blogspot.com
hmmm... sape2 bleh tolong alih bahasa melayu tak.... sian kat kita org yg x brape paham inggeris ni... berharap sangat2
Tun,
Pada pendapat saya, Kementerian Pelajaran perlu memasukkan perkara ini terutamanya dalam mata pelajaran sejarah mahupun kenegaraan. Malangnya perkara ini tidak disebut secara jelas dan kebanyakan generasi muda tidak tahu menahu atau hampir tiada langsung pengetahuan akan perkara ini. Jangan disalahkan golongan muda atau non-Bumi bila mereka mempersoalkan perkara ini. Akar umbinya, pihak kerajaan gagal menerapkan pemahaman ini sejak dari mula lagi.
Harapan saya agar Menteri Pelajaran dan Menteri Penerangan melakukan sesuatu untuk memberi pengetahuan tersebut. UMNO sebagai peneraju BN pun gagal untuk memberi pengetahuan yang jelas kepada parti-parti komponennya. Bila masa perkara ketuanan disebut-sebut, semua pihak komponen turut "melatah" sama. Pada pemahaman saya, Ketuanan bukan bermaksud menjadi "master" dan di bawahnya adalah "hamba", tetapi sebagai "guardian".
Salam TUN,
1. Once again, pendapat TUN tepat dan sgt bernas.
2. Apapun TUN saya ingin cadangkan TUN adakan petition online dr mana-mana website samaada website ini atau mana-manapun untuk MENGUNDI MENOLAK PAK LAH MENJADI PM atau MENGUNDI MEMINTA PAK LAH LETAK JAWATAN SEGERA....
3. Mungkin juga TUN boleh kemukakan cadangan ini kepada Pemuda UMNO supaya PETITION ONLINE diadakan di website PEMUDA UMNO, biar mereka tahu berapa ramai rakyat Malaysia yang mahu melihat PAK LAH TURUN..
4. HARAP cadangan saya diberi perhatian TUN untuk dilaksanakan secepat mungkin sebelum PAK LAH terus membuat kesilapan.
5. .....
TUN : HANG DOLAH, lebih baik kau turun sebelum Sultan yang dah jatuh murka akan kau hantar 'TULAH' pulak kot atas....
PAK LAH : Ni, HANG TUN boleh rileks sat tak, seluar aku pun dah basah niii....
banyak lagi akaun tak wat 'CLOSING' aku dah tutup semua akaun, dah CLEAR baru boleh cauu....
Wasalam...
Salam Tun,
thanks for the short introduction on subject of social contract. I will get myself understand the concept first before I participate in the discussion.
Regards
Assalamualaikum Tun,
Sekedar bertanya sahaja, apakah dasar pakatan BN merupakan satu sosial kontrak? Kalau betul begitu, maka semua kaum di Malaysia sekarang kenalah hormat dengan konsep tersebut. Janganlah suka sangat hendak ganggu guggat hak Orang Melayu dan Bumiputera negeri Sabah & Serawak.
Orang Melayu & Bumiputera lain perlu ingat bahwa kita di guggat kerana kita tidak dihormati; dipandang rendah, kenapa begitu??? kerana kita dianggap miskin, bodoh dan ketinggalan. Apabila kita menjadi pandai, kaya dan maju maka tidak ada sesiapapun yang akan berani mengguggat kita. Dengan itu barulah sosial kontrak Malaysia akan menjadi berkesan.
Terima-kasih, Wassalam.
Salam Tun,
Tun sudah begitu banyak berjasa pada Melayu dan Malaysia.
Entah kenapa ada orang yang nak mengungkit perkara-perkara yg baik, mencari yang HITAM.
Buka mata dan lihat pada situasi sekarang, siapa yg nak manjahamkan Melayu dan Malaysia.
Fikir-fikir dan renung-renungkanlah...
Salam Tun,
Persoalan yang timbul sekarang kenapa Kerajaan membenarkan forum yang melibatkan hak hak istimewa melayu,kontrak sosial dan ketuanan melayu dibincangkan tanpa sebarang sekatan,malang lagi perkara ini dianjur oleh sebuah badan yang semua tahu anti kerajaan dan dianggotai oleh bangsa India dan Cina.
Pengalaman saya pada tahun lepas amat perit untuk mendapat permit dari polis untuk menganjur majlis bersama TUN,tidak kurang dari 3 kali dipanggil oleh polis untuk mendapat penjelasan kenapa harus diadakan majlis untuk Tun.
Adakah ini disengajakan demi untuk dilihat sebagai sebuah negara yang terbuka dan mendapat sokongan dari puak puak pembangkang.Hanya Pak lah dan Syed Hamid sahaja yang tahu !
Sangat jelas apa yang Tun nyatakan.
Kepada penyokong Tun silalah join Kelab Chedet.com Malaysia. Baru ditubuhkan. sila email syhassan65@gmail.com
Assalamualaikum Dearest Tun
I am sorry that my readings on Greeks is very little. But the 'cepu mas' question for me is does any social contract really exist in Malaysia? I understand that we Melayu is the Tuan of this blessed land but why there was no mention of it during our schooling time. Forgive me Tun for being an average student (but I still manage to get good Master because of the fund provided during your administration), could not remember reading about it. Now Raja Petra is instigating the non Malays how the government is not fair in dealing with other race. From my understanding (without reading) can anybody question the preferential treatment given to the bumis.I have many Chinese and Indian friends and most of all are kind, hardworking and nice. I am afraid that what Raja Petra is doing will sow a hatrad to us Malays. I just wish that we could just say that there is an agreement that we bumiputra has been given preferential right on this land. I might be wrong but I need to know whether it is unquestionable issue. If the opposition gets the country, I would like to know whether they can change the issue of ketuanan Melayu? I for one can compete, but in the event of that happen, bumiputra will retaliates and thus makes the country unsafe for everybody. Also, Tun could you please elaborate on whether Kamal Attaturk legacy of a secularisme Turki can be changed. This is because last two weeks the courts granted that according to law Secularisme Turki will not accept students who wears hijab (tudung) even when the ruling parti wants Islamic values practiced in the country. Does it applies to Malaysia as well ?. Is it the same as 'Ketuanan Melayu' ?
Tun, could you translate your articles in Bahasa Malaysia. I could understand it but some of my friends cannot understand jargon words.
Thank you Tun
Dear Tun,
Another excellent snippet from you.
Bravo Tun!
Tun ,
The Bar Council will oraganise this rubbish forum on Social Contract but none of the Malay lawyers will be one the panel.
For a long time Bar Concil is a rubbish council . Why should they involve in politics when there are issues for them to solve.
If these people can't accept the Social Contract and the Malay Priveleges then they better do not stay in this country and call them themselves as 'Malaysian'.
Salam Tun. Semoga Allah lanjutkan usia Tun dan sentiasa sihat walafiat .
Tun,
Thanks for giving us the lesson on 'Social Contract'. Learn a lot from your blog.
http://sembang-kopitiam.blogspot.com/
Dear Antimamak,
Please open up your mind and don't let hate consumed you into going to the dark side. From all your posting , I noticed that you have already blocked your mind and focus on all negative aspect of Tun's writing.
The latest article is a proof of that.
From the article , it's apparent that Tun is only trying to tell the history of how social contract was formed.
Out of the blue , then came your deviate mind of trying to accuse Tun of using social contract for his own agenda.Your response to each of Tun's article are so fast which proof that you do keep on going to his blog for his latest update seeking chance's to shoot Tun's writing.
Fine if you have your own blog for "antimahathir" but as you said ," jangan buat kotor Tun's blog. Look deep into yourself and see who is doing all the dirts in other people blog.
Remember my antimamak friend ,
Hates will consumed a person's mind and turn him into a devil unconciously with no direction and objectivity in life.
May the force be with you.
PS : don't always talk on roti canai , it make me hungry and I am " NOT " your father.( ssss hoooooh , ssssss hooooh, sssss hoooh -- breathing heavily in a helmet.)
YAB Tun,
Why do think that there is this need to dissect and examine the social contract in this country now at this time?
A few learned individuals(I cant remember their names, they wrote a book analysing the social contract issue) have even suggested that it was during your administration that the term 'social contract' was coined. It was explained that this term never existed before your administration and that your administration coined the term as a strategy to secure and incite the Malays on their special privileges and therefore secure political attractiveness on the Malays. They even mentioned that Tan Sri Abdullah Ahamd was the first person to coin the term 'social contract'.
It was further argued that the term was coined more as a political tactic rather than an explanation to the so-called unneccesary handicap mechanism in the society categorise by race - which were causing unrest between the races.(how true is this, no one really bothered to study I guess)
I find that many who discussed this issue will decline or tend to not reflect on history and the reality of the Malaysian multiracial landscape pre and post Independence.
In my opinion, there exists this feeling of utopia in trying to achieve a higher level of unity from what Malaysia now have and should maintain. There seem to be this idea that the multiracial harmony that we enjoy now cannot be achieved if the Malays are given special rights. It seems that the utopia ideals of unity will somehow make Malaysia more attractive to live in.
It is clear these ideals are superficial to say the least. We should live in the reality and everyone should accept the facts of the situation with regards to our multiracial society.
Just because a few people can have coffee in Starbucks and they feel that they represent the national make-up of the country then they begin to question the reality of racial divide.We should instead recognise that if we depart from reality,totally ignore any notion of social contract that have actually served the country well and adopt a more utopian ideals which is not based on reality and history; we would probably cause disunity instead of achieving it.
Our forefathers were wise to mould the multiracial concept that is unique in the world because their cause was clear. We wanted freedom and we want it as a country that will benefit all. It is not because of righteousness, arrogance or racial might that prevailed then.
Unfortunately, our leaders and intellectual community are more concerned on how they are perceived as leaders and intellectuals rather than using their leadership and intellectual for the good of the nation and their generations. Our forefathers got it right not too long ago.It would be wise for this generation to do the same.
Salam,
Kita orang Melayu jangan sentuh pasal Social Contract ni Tun. Nanti orang India ngan Cina kata racist!
Sekarang ni, kita kena sokong apa-apa yang orang Cina dgn India kata. Kalau dia kata pasal orang Melayu tak mengapa, kita boleh join sbb itu tidak dikira racist. Tapi, apa-apa yang kita cakap pasal depa x boleh.
regards,
Mr Belimbing
mrbelimbing.blogspot.com
Assalamu'alaikum TDM dan semua pelawat yg dihurmati,
Tun sekarang begitu bersemangat menyedarkan rakyat dan sangat perihatin terhadap kepentingan negara.
Saya percaya Tun akan buat kejutan demi kejutan...dan paling mengejutkan Tun akan isytihar siapakah yang layak menyelamatkan negara ini, insyaAllah!
Tuhan selamatkan Tun dan keluarga, amin.
nawawidahalan.blogspot.com
apa2lah.. saya takde idea lagilah nak bagi.. nanti2lah. lepas baca semua komen. tapi tun, terima kasih kerana semua huraian tun setiap entry dlm blog ni begitu sistematik. i like...
pasal kes liwat anwar tu.. tak payah le kita debat. sebab dalam hal ni, salah sorang mesti tipu kita. sama ada budak tu, atau anwar. sapa yg buat konspirasi ni?.. BN?.. budak tu? atau anwar sendiri...? so, buang masa kita berteka-teki.. baik bincang benda2 yg lebih baik dan penuh ilmiah mcm ni kan tun..
Salam AYAHANDA TUN,
Just can't help loving your chedet.com although busy preparing for the joyous day on 13th July.
Izinkan,
Can't understand a 'skunk' telling us not to stink your blog?
Not to worry we have the required spray to defuse the smell.
Ayahanda wrote a sweet smelling and clean aired explaination of what a social contract simply means but there are still 'skunks'around emitting stenches.
15. What is clear is that a social contract is a general understanding on the part of a citizen to submit to and obey the laws and the institutions of the country. The social contract governs not just his relation with the country, its Government and its institutions but also his relationship with his fellow citizens.
We would like to put it in one simple sentence for the 'skunks'
Anyone born on this beautiful land would live, enyoys the freedom and rights of a citizen until one is buried six feet underground or turned into ashes.
What the skunks were unhappy about are the special rights and priviledges of the Melayu..right?
Not to worry, you have a very 'capable' government that will make all the necessary reforms to acomodate the merits so clamoured.
Looking forward to see the smiles on Mr. MCAs. MR MICs and the Mr. Oppositions.
To the Melayu, MENANG SORAK, KAMPUNG TERGADAI!
Masa itu kami nak lihat siapa yang menyediakan roti canai, siapa yang melayan siapa dibumi bertuah ini.
Alfatihah, Amin
Assalamualaikum Tun,
It is hard for me to imagine Malaysia going about the disbandment of social contract that has already been established. The people of Malaysia have yet to achieve the level of racial integrity that has united the people in countries such as Kazakhstan. I'm not sure how versed are you of the condition in that country: Thanks to the introduction of Communism by the Soviets, all subjects were treated equally. And as they left, everyone in the country sees someone beyond their skin color.
It's hard to achieve integrity without doing away with affirmative action. Yet without affirmative action, from what I'm seeing among the members of my own generation, we might well head toward another May 13th.
I eagerly await for your next blog entry.
Assalamualaikum Dear Tun,
Finally, a glimpse into the depths of your sublime reasoning. This revelation assures you of my continued and undivided support, Tun.
I conclude that the social contract means that a nation's law provides its benefits and protection to its citizens. Even those who are not citizens may enjoy this protection. However, to enjoy these benefits, these non-citizens must respect, submit to, and adhere to these laws.
By the very structure that enables this contract to be undertaken, it means that it is inevitable that some laws may appear to disfavour some people over others. This is the natural outcome of the laws having been drafted by earlier citizens as they saw fit, given their religion, culture, and relationship with one another.
As time passes by, however, the naturalization of non-citizens renders jus sanguinis to be indistinguishable from jus soli. If you are a citizen, you're a citizen, period.
This means that the laws the foreigners once had to endure, even if it felt unfair, could be reviewed. Of course, being a democratic country, these laws could only be changed with the agreement of the majority, and not based on whim. Furthermore, it means every citizen is of equal standing. Just because you are rich does not give you an extra vote, just because you were wrenched away from your homeland (with which current citizens had nothing to do with) does not mean you are entitled to be favoured, just because you have been granted titles by the state does not mean you matter more than other people. Laws can be changed, but with the majority behind it.
Question: since the citizens are bound to the laws, isn't the government (and all its arms and other extensions), which exists to implement these laws, similarly bound to the people?
Doesn't this means the government has a responsibility? To benefit and protect the people. Doesn't this mean the government's decisions must reflect this philosophy? So, whatever the government does, it should not burden the citizens. Of course, sometimes it is unavoidable that the rakyat faces some measure of discomfort. But discomfort is characterized by the promise that shortly in the future, things will get better.
We Malaysians are not in discomfort right now. We are in trouble. There is no promise at all that things will get better. In fact, it seems the government has seemed to promise things will get worse.
My second conclusion, this government of ours is no government at all. It does not benefit us. It does not protect us. It doesn't even listen to the cries of citizens.
This isn't a government. It's a gangster racket running a protection ring.
I fail to see otherwise. If any can conclusively show I am wrong, please do so. It would be wonderful to hear from Pak Lah's supporters, and not just hearing "Apa kau tau bodoh?! Pak Lah tu boss! Kau bukan! Diam laaa kau bodohhh!" dan yang sewaktu dengannya.
Tun, ignorant I may be, I hope I have not failed too badly at giving the type of comment you were hoping for.
Take care,
Izzat
Tun..
While most of us know what social contract is, the reason for debating The Ketuanan Melayu is still unclear. If it is already written in the Perlembagaan, why then it is still debated? There are numerous views of social contract. From political view, the contract as being between the people, but still asserted that they were obligated to obey their government. This very same contract was used to overthrowned the King of France. It was a progressive work that helped inspire political reforms or revolutions in Europe, especially in France. Is that what they are trying to do in Malaysia? Don't they remember the name Tanah Melayu was used before Malaysia. I bet the next move they will do is to questions openly the Malay Rights even though most the non-Malay have been saying that they won't as it is written in the Perlembagaan. My question is why is it everytime Tun or any other Malay talks about our rights will be label 'Racist'?
salam hormat.
This is a very basic understanding on social contract, which I reckon every Malaysian to read about.
In my opinion, it is normal for every race to fight for their own as long as they're sensitive towards the impact to every other races that they're living with.
Having said that, it is not right to label a Malay as a racist when he talks only about Malay. Same goes to a chinese who asks for a special chinese school even when he said he is promoting national unity and equality among Malaysians.
As ironic as it could be, social contract is about the majority. If the pursue is for the minority to break the dominance, it is not the educated equality that we Malaysian shall seek.
Assalamualaikum TUN,
Ketika saya menghadiri kursus BTN, ada didedahkan dengan maksud tersirat social contract ini. Antaranya kalau saya tak salah adalah Agama Islam adalah agama rasmi negara, bahasa melayu sebagai bahasa kebangsaan dan hak2 istimewa org melayu (harap TUN betulkan jika salah). Menarik pada saya tentang social contract ini adalah semua kaum bukan bumiputra sentiasa menuntut hak kesamarataan dgn ingin melucutkan hak istimewa orang melayu.
Jika diteliti, walaupun kita ada hak istimewa org melayu tetapi pada masa yang sama kita juga tidak menafikan hak2 kaum bukan bumiputra walaupun hak2 itu bukan hak istimewa. Cuma hal2 tertentu saja yang sememangnya org2 melayu atau bumiputra ada kelebihan. Kita tidak menafikan hak2 lain pada bangsa bukan melayu contohnya berniaga, hidup di bumi Malaysia merebut segala peluang pekerjan dan kehidupan.
Kita juga tidak menafikan hak beragama. Bebas untuk mereka beragama apa pun mengikut fahaman mereka.
Kita juga tidak menafikan hak bahasa walaupun mereka ingin mengamalkan bahasa ibunda mereka dan belajar di bumi Malaysia bahasa ibunda mereka.
Kita juga tak menafikan hak pelajaran, apa saja hak lain yang memang telah pun mereka perolehi tanpa halangan atau kekangan dari kita.
Hak untuk hidup bersama kita mencari makan juga tak penah dihalang malah mereka juga bukan penduduk asal tanah melayu ini diberikan HAK KEWARGANEGARAAN.
Apa lagi yang mereka ini mahukan? Semuanya telah kita berikan kepada mereka yang bukan bumiputra ini. Hak biasiswa dan juga pelajaran, berapa kerat anak melayu yang boleh meneruskan pengajian ke peringkat tertinggi jika dibandingkan dgn bangsa2 lain di Malaysia sendiri?
Semua hak lain yang adil dan saksama tanpa mengira kaum telah pun diberikan kepada bangsa2 ini yang bukan bumiputra. KENAPA HANYA SEDIKIT HAK YANG BUMIPUTRA ADA IAITU HAK ISTIMEWA ORANG MELAYU INI MASIH LAGI BANGSA2 INI MAHUKAN IANYA DIHAPUSKAN? KENAPA JADI MACAM NI?
Adakah org melayu kita sedar, adakah generasi muda kini, yang bakal mewarisi kepimpinan negara Malaysia sedar akan semua ini? Saya mat sedih TUN kerana kita sudah alpa dan leka dengan situasi ini.
Saya harap blog TUN akan dapat bangunkan bangsa melayu dan mengingatkan BANGSA2 LAIN bahawa BANGSA MELAYU sudah BYK BERKORBAN untuk KESEJAHTERAAN BANGSA2 YANG MASIH TAK SEDAR INI.
Sekian TUN.
Selamat Petang Tun,
I'm new here, so what i comment now, may not be related to Social Contracts. But what i see now, the malaysian politics is in total chaos. What i said is, it is totally out of control.Our MCA president is not seeking relection n the MIC youth is stepping down.Is it because they have no confidence with the current goverment? Perviously when Tun is the Prime Minister no such things happen. I really salute Tun. Long life Tun.
Alhamdulillah TUN
Sejak mula meulis blog, banyak yang telah Tun bincangkan dan kami makin paham keadaan politik Malaysia, pandangan insider dan orang berpengalaman macam TUn memang kami hargai. Tun Juga rasanya semakin dekat dengan rakyat, jika dibandingkan dengan pembesar-pembesar yang lain
Teruskan menulis.
Salam Tun,
Semua komen Tun selama ini amat berguna untuk kami semua, yang cintakan Malaysia.
Teruskan usaha murni Tun ini. Semoga ianya dapat menjadi panduan kepada generasi muda di kemudian hari.
Dan semoga ianya dapat dijadikan rujukan di masa hadapan.
Terima kasih Tun
Tun,
In my personal opinion, social contract is relevant and will always be relevant for Malaysia. But as everything else, nothing can remained the same. The social contract that we have today should be amended time to time as to reflect the current face of malaysian landscape.
Razamith
http://malaysianfreak.blogspot.com
Dear Tun,
Al'Alaq :1 - Bacalah dengan nama Pengatur yang menciptakan.
Al'Alaq :2 - Khaliq menciptakan manusia dari segumpal darah
Al'Alaq :3 - Bacalah! dan Pengaturmu yang paling pemurah
Al'Alaq :4 - Yang mengajar manusia dengan perantaraan Kalam
Al'Alaq :5 - Dia mengajarkan kepada manusia apa yang tidak
diketahuinya.
Best regards.
Assalamualaikum Ayahnda Tun,
Saya sungguh berterimakasih atas penjelasan yang begitu baik dari Tun tentang social contract. TAPI alangkah baiknya, jika dapat Tun adakan dalam Bahasa Melayu pula.
Ini memudahkan lagi saya dan anak2 yang kurang faham dalam bahasa inggeris untuk memahaminya.
Terimakasih Ayahnda Tun.
Tun,
Nampaknya bukan sahaja parti Abdullah Badawi & konco2nya malah parti pembangkang juga sedang terumbang-ambing dengan pakatan yang kucar-kacir serta nakhodanya Anwar yang penuh seribu keraguan dan kesangsian. Dalam usaha Anwar membawa politik memecahbelah dan character ASSasination terutama sifat Unislamic beliau yang sering memburukkan peribadi lawan2 politik beliau daripada politik kepimpinan dan perpaduan, kini beliau sendiri terjerat dalam permainan politik kotor beliau sendiri. Seperti biasa, Abdullah Badawi lemah longlai dalam kemelut politik terkini, malah jelas sekali Abdullah sedang berusaha menutup mulut Najib yang kelihatan terkapai2.
Bagi, Anwar pula bagaimana beliau hendak memperjuangkan Social Contract dan Ketuanan Melayu jika beliau sendiri bergelumang dalam ketuanan DAP, Wolfowitz, Foundation for Future, PKR yang semakin dikikis kemelayuan dan kepimpinan beliau yang ketandusan idea2 memajukan negara...lihat sahaja blog Anwar yang hanya mewarwarkan imej beliau, mengagungkan buku2 penulisan Barat daripada penulisan Islam, dan tiada langsung menawarkan apa2 cadangan konkrit bagi membantu rakyat yang kini dibeban kesusahan akibat kenaikan harga barang2.
Anwar bukan sahaja bersikap dayus malah hipokrit. Bila berdepan lapuran beliau dituduh meliwat pembantu peribadinya, beliau melarikan diri. Jika di pihak yang benar, mengapa menyembunyikan diri? Tampillah kehadapan, rakyat tidak lah bersikap prejudis seperti beliau dan konco2 politiknya. Mengapa setelah beberapa minggu kononnya diugut nyawa, baru semalam bersembunyi? Mengapa tiada lapuran polis dibuat oleh beliau? mengapa bersembunyi di Kedutaan Turki? Apakah hulubalang atau pahlawan Melayu bila rasa terancam, bertindak menyembunyikan diri daripada berdiri paling depan mempertahankan bangsa, agama dan negara. Nampaknya, Anwar lebih mendaulatkan Turki (negara paksi Amerika) daripada tanahair sendiri.
Konco2 Anwar bingkas sekali menuduh pertuduhan liwat pembantu khas Anwar sebagai konspirasi UMNO, BN, Peguam Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara. Mungkin tidak hairan selepas ini Anwar menuduh ini konspirasi Tun Mahathir pula. Yang jelas, bagi Anwar yang hipokrit terhadap badan kehakiman negara ini, setiap isu yang menyebelahi beliau dikira adil, yang tidak menyebelahi beliau ditohmah tidak adil. Inilah Anwar yang sebenarnya, mudah sekali menuduh pihak lain tanpa bukti tapi bingkas sekali menyaman pihak lain bila menghadapi tuduhan.
Mungkin Anwar bisa menjadi Perdana Menteri In Waiting (Forever) yang paling banyak menyaman orang bila berkuasa kelak!!!! Apakah prang2 Melayu yang mempertahankan Social Contract dan Ketuanan Melayu sanggup dijaja oleh Ketuanan Anwar, DAP, PKR dan Majlis Peguam yang jelas semakin kurang ajar dan lupa sejarah.
Ayuh bangsa Melayu, sedarlah, bangunlah, berdirilah dibelakang Tun Mahathir untuk menegakkan ketuanan Melayu dan keadilan terhadap bangsa2 lain di negara ini.
Teruskan perjuangan Tun, kita semakin hari semakin melangkah ke depan.
Salam TDM,
what can I say, you always giving the your best and even the explanation is so good.
You are my idol then, now and forever.
Assalamualaikum Tun.
Tun macam lecturer.Lecturer pun tak macam ni.Saya suka nak belajar dari orang yang pandai2.
Sosial kontrak termaktub walaupun tanpa agreement.
Seorang pakcik Cina kata dulu masa nenek moyang dia boleh la dikira pendatang.Tapi la ni bila dah masuk keturunan ke-2 dan seterusnya,masyarakat cina bolehlah dianggap sama rata dengan bangsa Melayu.Sebab lahir di Malaysia.Kefahaman bagi orang susah la.Yang berilmu suka memandang rendah la pulak pada bangsa Melayu.Tapi ada jugak yang ok.
Masyarakat Cina bila susah suka nak menyalahkan kerajaan Melayu kerana tidak begitu menolong bangsa mereka jika dibandingkan dengan bangsa Melayu.Yelah hidup mau cari makan.Kalau tak boleh nak cari makan mestilah mengamuk diaorang.
Maknanya kita ni adalah tuan mereka, sebab bila tak kena je mereka mesti nak menyalahkan bangsa melayu.
Terima kasih Tun.
Salam Tun,
This will be my first ever posting in Tun's blog. I have been reading but this particular topic interests me greatly.
Going by the reasoning you have out forth on the matter, what happen when citizens who had been following the unwritten convention decide otherwise?
Being unwritten, wouldn't it then allow some one to turn around and say, this is not the rule as we know it.
I believe the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis did far more damage to our (the country's) march towards some semblance of a Bangsa Malaysia you have envisage some time ago.
Alas, it seems to me that now we are seeing Liberals or like minded Malaysians assuming that being liberal minded means they encapsulate the essential Malaysianness (for lack of a better word).
Comments from the self same netizens have however shown a tendency to equate "Malaysian" to be those who veers to the left.
I stand to be corrected, but these are only my humble thoughts on the matter and I look forward to share more as soon as you share yours on the country own unwritten rules.
God Bless, Tun.
"Perhaps it would be useful if we understand this concept a little bit more before we argue about it."
Yes we must full understand before we argue about it.
Salam Tun,
Why should it be questioned? I was born in Sabah. My father is Malay from Selangor. My mum is Sabahan (Kadazan converted to Muslim). I have eight siblings in my family. Im marrried to an Indian Muslim and my Company partner is Chinese....
What is there to argue? If the Contract Social been argued, what will happen to my generation?
Dear Tun,
This is another great article... but, I believe these type of articles will always be viewed as a "racial based article". Well, since we live in a culture and society that consist of several race, racism is always going to be an issue.
I think the most important thing for the society is to understand the need to have a strong integration and the stability to ensure that people can live in harmony. It is important that wealth of a nation is being distributed evenly and the wealth can be enjoyed by each and every citizen in the country. We need to ensure that every person in the country can at least get the minimum standard of living with a decent house, a decent income, a decent 3 times a day meal and a decent medical benefits. I believe in a strong society, there is no need to compete with each other to show-off who is having the biggest Mercedes or the expensive renovations... What we need is a caring society who understand that life is short and beatiful and it need to be appreciated with a great sense of blessing.
When the leaders are busy, trying to climb the ladder of power, it is really sad to see that the rakyat is being left out. Nobody cares about man on the street and nobody bother to extend a helping hand. And that is happening in Malaysia... The government now seems to losing the focused and introduce a capitalist measures and survival of the fittest philosophy to brave the stormy economic weathers. The price of oil has reached USD140++ and there is very little effort by the government to really address the issue.
I hope that there will be a better tomorrow for Malaysia....
Thanks
Salam Tun.
Ingin maklumkan disini bahawa saya hadir di forum yang dianjurkan
oleh bar council tempoh hari yang bertajuk Social Contract.
Nampaknya pengajur tak faham cara hendak mengajur forum sesuatu topic yang sensitif.
Dua ahli panel nampaknya dari pembangkang dan anti kerajaan. Kalau
sesuatu forum yang ahli2 panelnya adalah dari parti pembangkang
bukan tak boleh, tapi perlulah memberi pendapat yang secara bebas tidak berpihak mana2 parti atau menghentam mana2 parti lain jika
forum ini terbuka kepada umum dengan di hujung nama ahli panel bila diumumkan senarai ahli panel hendaklah dicatit dengan professionnya serta kelayakannya.
Tapi kalau ahli panel mmemihak kepada sesuatu parti dan menghentam
parti yang lain dalam ucapannya, maknanya forum itu adalah diantara antara ahli atau penyokong parti. Maka dihujung nama ahli2 panel
hendaklah dinyatakan dari parti mana. Jika org MCA perlu lah tulis
MCA di akhir nama mereka. Begitu juga jika orangnya ahli umno, mesti tulis UMNO dihujung dimana tempat di iklankan forum ini.
Dengan itu orang boleh menganggak apa yang akan di bahaskan. Orang umno tak akan pergi jika ahli panelnya diketahui adalah orang pembangkang kerena sudah tentu hanya untuk menghentam kerajaan. Ini sudah tentunya.Begitulah juganya jika ahli panelnya dari atau penyokong kerajaan.
Sebab itu bila dengan lantang seorang panelist mengutuk UMNO, maka bangunlah ahli umno yang hadir bangun dan terus kecam panelist tersebut.Nasi tidak ramai melayu yang hadir. saya percaya jika lebih
ramai melayu yang hadir, akan terjadi sesuatu yang tidak diingini.
Forum untuk membincangkan social contract biarlah dibuat secara tertutup. Jemputlah orang tertinggi jawatan dalam NGO-NGO melayu dan bukan melayu yang pada pendapat saya mereka boleh mengawal emosi.
Isu Social Contract pada saya tidak perlu di perbesarkan jika MCA, Gerakan, MIC dan lain2 parti kompenen bukan bumi, masih dalam Basrisan Nasional. Jka setia dengan Barisan Nasional maknanya mereka
bersetuju dengan dasar DEB.
This is what you call LEADERSHIP! Tun, you are always above the rest and this is one of the main reasons why you will always remain relevant to mankind.
To the bystanders (including the man who thinks he is the PM and his entire 'Kitchen Cabinet') take note of what this STATESMAN is saying and try to learn from his wisdom.
Emulate the wise and their wisdom, NOT the clown and his fellow jokers.
Dear Tun Dr.Mahathir Mohamad, I don't think we Malaysians could return your favour to this nation and its well being.
THANK YOU, SIR !
www.apanama2020.blogspot.com
TUN
YANG DI SANJUNGI DAN SAYANGI.
Kepada semua teman bloger,
"BALAS BUDI DAN JASA TUN"
TUN DAH BUAT PART DIA,
DIA DAH TULIS SURAT SURUH KEPADA PAK LAH UNTUK LETAK JAWATAN, BEGITU JUGA DENGAN MUKHRIZ. BANYAK YANG TAK FAHAM KENAPA TUN BERTINDAK DEMIKIAN WALAU RAMAI YANG SOKONG DAN YAKIN AKAN TINDAKAN TUN
TAPI,
PAK LAH TETAP DEGIL DAN KERAS KEPALA, BUTA HATI PEKAK TELINGA.
APA YANG TUN TULIS KAT BLOG SINI, BAGI MENCERITAKAN DAN MENJELASKAN INTIPATI KEBENARAN UNTUK KITA TAHU DENGAN LEBIH JELAS,step by step KENAPA TUN BERTINDAK SEDEMIKIAN. SATU PERSATU SUDAH DI JELASKAN. RAMAI DI ANTARA KITA MASIH MENUNGGU BILA LAGI ‘PELURU-PELURU EMAS TUN’ NAK DILEPASKAN BEGITU JUGA ‘PELURU AJAIB TUN’ NAK MELEDAK ATAU MELETUP.
TUN SEORANG PEMIMPIN YANG BERMARUAH DAN BERKRISMA SERTA BERWAWASAN, TAK MUNGKIN NAK BUAT TINDAKAN YANG SAMA MACAM DSAI, BAWA REFORMASI TURUN TURUN KE JALANAN.
KITA RAKYAT YANG TELAH MENDAPAT INFORMASI DALAM BLOG INI, PERLU MENCARI LEBIH BANYAK PENGARUH DAN SOKONGAN DENGAN APA YANG TUN SAMPAIKAN.
RAKYAT PERLU TUNJUKKAN SIGNAL PADA TUN BAHAWA RAKYAT BENAR-BENAR SUDAH MAJORITI SOKONG TUN. INTERNET INI MAYA TAK JELAS, MEMANG PENGARUHNYA BESAR DAN DAHSYAT. KITA PERLUKAN YANG NYATA. SOKONGAN YANG NYATA.
ADALAH PERLU SEKARANG,
KITA PULA YANG TUNJUKKAN SOKONGAN KITA DAN BERTINDAK UNTUK TUN.
JASA TUN SEBAGAI PEMIMPIN YANG TELAH BANYAK MERUBAH KEADAAN DAN NASIB RAKYAT TAK TERBALAS OLEH KITA.
SEMOGA TUHAN SAJA YANG MEMBALASNYA NANTI, DENGAN MELETAKKAN BELIAU BERSAMA-SAMA ORANG YANG DIKASIHINYA NANTI...AMIEN.
DENGAN BERTINDAK CARA SENYAP DAN AMAN, KEPUTUSANNYA DARI TINDAKAN KITA, TUN LEBIH MUDAH MEMIKIRKAN TINDAKAN SETERUSNYA. TUN AMAT BERHATI HATI DALAM SETIAP KEPUTUSANNYA, TIDAK MAHU RAKYAT MENJADI MANGSA. TIDAKLAH SEPERTI PEMIMPIN DSAI DAN DSAB YANG LEBIH KEPADA KEPENTINGAN PERIBADI.
BAGI TUN YANG SUDAH BERUSIA,
BOLEH SAJA BELIAU BERDIAM DIRI DAN MEMBELA DIRI APABILA PERLU.
OLEH ITU, DENGAN KESEMPATAN YANG KITA ADA INI,
KITA RAKYAT SEPATUTNYA MENUNJUKKAN SOKONGAN PADU KITA BERSAMA TUN. BUKAN MENUNGGU SAJA APA AKAN BERLAKU SELEPAS INI?...APA LANGKAH TUN SELEPAS INI?....
INI LAH YANG DIKATAKAN OLEH TUN ‚“PERPADUAN“, DALAM MENURUNKAN PMIMPIN YANG TELAH MEMBAWA KECELAKAAN PADA RAKYAT DAN NEGARA. KITA BERSATU PADU.
KALAU TUN MAHU,
TUN BOLEH SURUH SAJA KITA SEMUA TURUN PADANG, KITA AKAN TURUN.
TAPI RAMAI MANA YANG TAHU AKAN PERJUANGAN INI YANG SEBENARNYA.
SAYA FAHAM LANGKAH TUN, LANGKAH SEORANG PAHLAWAN, LANGKAH SEORANG PENAKLUK,.....
KALAU MELANGKAH, LANGKAH MUSUH PASTI MATI...
INILAH PAHLAWAN KITA, INILAH PEMIMPIN PENAKLUK KITA...
DISEGANI OLEH RAMAI, DALAM DAN LUAR NEGARA.
YANG PERLU DISANJUNGI DAN HORMATI.
TUN SUDAH USULKAN ALTERNATIF KEPADA MP UMNO DAN AHLI UMNO,
TAPI NAMPAKNYA MEREKA MASIH TAKUT UNTUK BERTINDAK DAN BERSUARA.
KENAPA..?
KEPENTINGAN DIRI..? ATAU TEKANAN..?
PADA SAYA LEBIH KEPADA KEPENTINGAN DIRI MACAM LALANG.
IKUT TIUPAN ANGIN, TAK BERANI MELAWAN ANGIN….
TIDAK ADA SEMANGAT JUANG DALAM DIRI MEREKA….
TIDAK ADA JATI DIRI DALAM DIRI MEREKA.....
KEBANYAKAN HANYA BONEKA SAJA...
.
KITA PUN PATUT BERASA BERSALAH DI SINI,
KERANA SALAH MEMILIH WAKIL KITA.
JADI, PADA PANDANGAN SAYA,
KITA SELAKU RAKYAT BIASA, ATAU AHLI UMNO BIASA, PEWARIS DAN PELAPIS BANGSA
HARUS BERTINDAK DARI SEKARANG DENGAN “CARA SENYAP DAN AMAN“,
KITA MEMBANTAH KEPIMPINAN PAK LAH.
USULAN SAYA PADA SEMUA:
APA KATA TUN:
Mulai 1 julai 2008 kita lakukan “Bantahan Senyap Untuk Pak Lah” sampai 31hb Ogos 2008 kemuncaknya dengan:
1) Memakai pin ribbon warna putih , atau
2) Menaikan bendera putih di kereta, di motor depan rumah, depan kedai dan pejabat dll
( Ribbon putih 1 meter Rm1.50 = dapat 20 ribon. Kain Putih 1 meter Rm3.00 dapat 25 bendera kecil. Kalau berkonsi modal, BERKORBAN tak sampai Rm1.00 seorang )
Marilah kita sama-sama sokong dan bertindak untuk TUN.
Lakukan segera, Mulakan hari ini, kalau boleh sekarang juga.
Buktikan suara rakyat boleh berkuasa: Malaysia Boleh..!!!!
Inilah sumbangan kita kepada agama bangsa dan Negara.
Jangan macam “anjing menyalak bukit aja“ tak bawakita ke mana....
TUNJUKKAN PADA TUN....KITA BENAR-BENAR SOKONG TUN......
Keadaan sudah parah :
Bak kata Telur Hujung Tanduk dan Retak menungu Belah...
Salam dari perantau
_ashar_5;50_ 30 june 2008
Email: ashar_abdullah@yahoo.com
YM : ashar_abdullah
Angkatan Lancang Kuning Nusantara
EMAIL SAYA UNTUK DAPATKAN 'APA AKSI KITA DALAM KEMPEN INI'
SEMAK KEMBALI INFORMASI:
POSTED DALAM : PERPADUAN
By ashar on June 25, 2008 7:51 PM
POSTED DALAM : SNIPPET/CORAT-CORET
By ashar on June 26, 2008 4:30 PM
Assallamualaikum Tun ,
Terima kasih Tun utk ulasan2 yang sungguh berguna untuk kami jadikan rujukan.Membesar dibawah kepimpinan Tun sebenarnya menberikan kami banyak peluang untuk menilai dan menbuat perbandingan diantara kemampuan pemimpin hari ini utk memimpin dibandingkan mereka2 yang berada dizaman Tun.Walau dahulunya banyak perkara yang tidak saya fahami ( maklumlah masih muda dan mudah dipengaruhi ).hari ini fahamlah saya,apapun yang Tun buat pada zaman pemerintahan Tun dahulu adalah utk kebaikan semua.
Sehingga hari ini,ramai teman2 saya yang berbangsa cina,india amat mengagumi Tun malah menganggap isu racism ini hanyalah isu yang digembar gemburkan oleh pihak2 yang tidak bertanggungjawap.
Katalah apapun selama pemerintahan Tun,kami menbesar tanpa ada isu - isu yang sepertimana dapat kita dengar hari ini.
Semoga Allah menberikan kesihatan yang baik untuk Tun Seisi keluarga.
p/s : Sehingga hari ini,bila duduk berkumpul bersama2 teman2 berbilang bangsa,walau banyak perkara yang kami bincangkan,kesudahannya kami semua seia sekata - Alangkah baiknya jika kita masih dizaman pemerintahan Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammad.
I honestly dont see any special rights and privileges given to the malays. Most of the time i think it is unfair and negatively affecting the malays. WHen i was a student in a private university, I was consistently being told by lecturers of how unfair it is of the special rights for the malays. Up to a point it makes me quite embarrassed to be a malay in my own country. But they do not see that there is no such thing as a racial "right" to be given special treatment in the constitution.
I have a Masters degree and yet my higher education is borne by myself. However, my undergraduate degree was loaned by MARA but as stated it is a loan in which i had to repay fully after my degree. The bumiputra discount on houses are just a marketing gimmick.When I apply to buy a house, the housing developer either gives me a higher priced house or a house located in a situation where no one would have any interest in buying. And i can only sell the higher priced house to only another bumiputera who i believe wont be able to afford to buy one.
And now i am doing my own business. Most of the time, my clients are from the non bumis who value the performance of my company rather than my skin.I have approached many UMNO gangs for contracts but UMNO doesnt really exist to help any malay businessmen. They exist only to benefit themselves.
assalamualaikum...
saya sebagai anak melayu yang lahir pada zaman selepas merdeka, melihat sosial kontrak ini sebagai perjanjian antara melayu dan bukan melayu. perjanjian dimana melayu itu sebagai tuan ditanah melayu, dan bukan melayu sebagai tetamu di tanah melayu. bagaimanapun bukan melayu ini bukanlah hamba kepada ketuanan melayu, tetapi sebagai kawan atau sahabat yang menghadapi segala dugaan bersama. kaya bersama, susah bersama, menangis bersama, dan gembira bersama.
apabila sosial kontrak ini mahu digubal menjadikan melayu bukan tuan, tetapi mahu kesama-rataan atau adil(penyokong pembangkang sering cakap adil= sama rata).Islam mengajar kita adil ialah 'meletakkan sesuatu hak itu kepada yang berhak'bukan sama rata. Ingin saya tegaskan disini, adilkah kita kalau mengambil tanah tuan yang telah meminjamkan tanahnya untuk berkongsi kehidupan didunia ini. melayu tak minta banyak... cuma jangan diganggu apa yang telah menjadi haknya...
apa yang saya lihat sekarang ini ialah ketamakan bukan melayu, kerana melayu tidak pernah mengambil kekayaan mereka. bukan melayu mahu mengambil kekayaan melayu pula dengan tender terbuka. kerajaan walaupun mempunyai kuasa untuk mengarahkan syarikat bukan melayu untuk memberikan tender untuk melayu... tetapi kerajaan tidak buat begitu kerana kontrak sosial, kerana menghormati hasil kerja kaum lain. kesan negatif kontrak sosial adalah kepada mereka yang tamak dan sering berhasad dengki. sekarang ada melayu yang mahu buang kontrak sosial ini kerana mahu berkuasa dan terus menerus meracuni fikiran rakyat.
KONTRAK SOSIAL SEBENARNYA UNTUK MELAYU, SUPAYA BUKAN MELAYU TIDAK MENINDAS MELAYU.
KONTRAK SOSIAL JUGA SEBENARNYA UNTUK BUKAN MELAYU, SUPAYA MELAYU TIDAK MENINDAS BUKAN MELAYU.
kita masing-masing ada hak dan janganlah kerana hasad dengki dan cemburu, jika kita menhapuskan kontrak sosial sama seperti kta menghapuskan persefahaman antara kaum dan akhirnya malaysia hancur.
Dearest Tun,
Thanks for enlighten.. So much has been learned from your blog. Be waiting for your next discussion. At the end, resolve our differences and bersatu untuk Malaysia 2020.
Salam buat Tun dan isteri semoga sihat hendakNya.
Akhirnya dapat juga mengetahui artikel terbaru Tun hari ini.
setiap sejam saya bukak nak tahu artikel terbaru dari Tun.
Saya amat berharap sekiranya Tun dapat memberikan kami cadangan serta idea-idea yang bernas bagi Memartabatkan bangsa Melayu dan Memprtahankan Hak-hak kami orang Melayu,org Asli,Sabah, Dan juga Sarawak.Semakin lama rasanya Hak-hak ini seolah-olah akan luput!
kaum India dan Cina ingin menghapuskan sama sekali hak yang ada sekarang.Pada mereka keistimewaan yang ada sekarang perlu lah dikongsi sama rata. Saya amat tidak bersetuju dengan pekara ini.
Tun berikan kami Cadangan untuk Hal ini!!!
Dan bagaimana pula dengan cadangan Ansar untuk protes senyap pasang kain putih????
kain dah beli ni......
BAIK PUNYA......
salam tun,
Pada saya, tun adalah satu-satu pemimpin yang dianugerah Allah kepada Malaysia. Sesungguhnya kita didalam kerugian sekarang kerana mendapat PM yang kurang berpengetahuan yang menyebabkan kerosakan pada negara, bangsa dan ugama.
SETUJU CADANGAN ASAR!!!
ESOK KITA PAKAT RAMAI-RAMAI.....
1) Memakai pin ribbon warna putih , atau
2) Menaikan bendera putih di kereta, di motor depan rumah, depan kedai dan pejabat dll
AYUH TUMBANGKAN PAK LAH NGOK DAN KERONI-KERONI SYAITAN NI!!!
Dear Tun,
This is my first posting. Thanks for your general info on the Social Contract. I believe in your next posting you will elaborate more on so-called Malaysian Social Contract.
I really hope you can incorporate other countries in Asia or other parts of the continents with regards to the Social Contract implementation. This is paramount important in order to fully conversant the implicit and explicit meanings, particularly to the young Malaysians in quest augment their knowledge on this subject matter. I believe that the young generation lack of knowledge pertaining to this issue was driven primarily to our curriculum syllabus in our secondary education.
I also need Tun's opinion pertaining to current energy crisis and decision made by Tun to halt nuclear energy development during early 1980's after the discovery of oil in East Coast of Peninsular. I believe this issue is the hot issue nowadays as portrayed by our major newspapers. For your info, I am currently pursuing my post-graduate study in nuclear engineering in a foreign land.
Salam
May I be allowed to inform everyone of a very relevant topic that will be presented tomorrow night:(the issu affects all of us, Malaysians included)-
Tajuk : “DECEPTION IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER”
( Pemutar-belitan dalam Orde Baru Dunia )
Tarikh & Masa : Selasa, 1/7/2008, 8.00 malam
Tempat : Auditorium Bangunan MPSJ, USJ5
Penceramah : Sheikh Dr Abdullah Hakim Quick
Pensyarah Kanan (Islam in Africa)
International Peace University of South Africa, Cape Town
ANJURAN BERSAMA :
BIRO DAKWAH PERKIM SELANGOR
dan
MAJLIS PERBANDARAN SUBANG JAYA (MPSJ), SELANGOR
Terbuka kepada orang ramai, Islam dan bukan Islam
Hj.Headir 012-221 3477 / Dr Haji Syed Haleem 013- 2044 818
Some of our confusion in the current political "turbulence" may ease a bit thereafter.
Another website you should read (see a bigger picture of "imperialism") is:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Endowment_for_Democracy
Salaam to our dear Tun and family. May Allah Bless you.
What's really valuable in a society?
We born-and-raised folks can be oblivious to what is best about our culture because it is so normal, as unnoticed as the air. We may not see the good until it is gone, as in the expression, “You don’t miss the water till the well runs dry.”
When we shriek with disgust that poverty, racism, and inequality still exist in our society, we could learned that those disaffections have been tackled more honestly and with better results here and develop to become necessary to have laws which govern the behaviour of members of the society. All citizens were committed to respect and submit to the laws. This understanding is in fact a social contract and moving for a formal contract. A formal contract of a social contract is yet to be further improved to be use of law to achieve equality and could be done better in an admittedly imperfect society.
Political theory relies heavily on the ideas of a social contract and a constitution. A social contract, made famous by the French philosopher Rousseau is an imaginary agreement between people in the state of nature that leads to the establishment of a community or a state. In the state of nature people are free and are not obliged to follow any rules or laws. They are essentially sovereign individuals. But through the social contract they surrender their individual sovereignty to the collective and create the community or the state. This state then acts as an agent of the sovereign people, exercising the sovereignty that has been delegated to it by the people through the social contract in order to realize the wishes of the people enshrined in the objectives of the social contract.
While western political thinkers like Rousseau and Locke have used this idea of an imaginary social contract as a fundamental premise for theorizing the modern state, there are really very few real examples of such an event in human history. In the American history, the Mayflower compact is one example. The writing and signing of the constitution after six months of deliberation in Philadelphia may be considered as another example of a social contract.
The second idea that underpins contemporary political theory is the concept of the constitution. In many ways the constitution is the document that enshrines the conditions of the social contract upon which any society is founded. The writing of a constitution is a very old idea. Aristotle himself had collected over 300 written constitutions in his lifetime.
Muhammad (PBUH) in his great wisdom demonstrated a democratic spirit quite unlike the authoritarian tendencies of many of those who claim to imitate him today. He chose to draw up a historically specific constitution based on the eternal and transcendent principles revealed to him and sought the consent of all who would be affected by its implementation.
In simple terms, we need to establish in society based on a social contract, constitutional in character and the ruler ruled with the explicit written consent of all the citizens of the state. Today we need to draw up our own constitutions, historically and temporally specific to our conditions and based on the eternal and transcendent principles revealed by "true devine research" (however, unwritten/spiritual/imaginary law of the universe/nature/jungle). We can use the "true devine research" as an example of how to develop manuals from principles?
The "true devine research" establish the importance of consent and cooperation for governance. According to this research Muslims and non-Muslims are equal citizens of the state, with identical rights and duties. Communities with different religious orientations enjoy religious autonomy. Which essentially is wider in scope than the modern idea of religious freedom. The "true devine research" establish a pluralistic state -- a community of communities. It promises equal security to all and all are equal in the eyes of the law. The principles of equality, consensual governance and pluralism are beautifully enmeshed in the "true devine research".
It is amazing to see how "true divine research" perfection is so democratic, so tolerant and compassionate against the admittedly society interpretation of the same is so harsh, so authoritarian and so intolerant. We must learn from the principles of "good true devine faith" but also human virtues of mercy, compassion, equality, justice and tolerance.
Dearest Ayahanda Tun, Thank You so very much for enlightening us on this matter.
I would sincerely like to say that 'Gone and Those were the Days'. We are what we are today. Times have changed. Barrier will only seperate us.
Please take a good look and see how does thousands of bloggers address you. Let them be Malay, Chinese or Indians, and others, they address you Ayahanda. If this is not sincere enough,I really dont know what is. You see even those that we despise, we still call Pak.
Sorry to voice that I Am All For 1, And 1 For All, except religion.
Once again thank you AYAHANDA.
Dearest Yg Berbahgia Tun,
As always, excellent and clear explanation! You always have very convincing way of explaining matters to us, the “rakyat”. I believe that's your greatest strength.
Teruskan perjuangan murni Tun. Semoga Tun dan keluarga sentiasa dirahmati Allah SWT. Saya sokong Tun.
Salam Tun...
and all bloggers.
Pada hakikatnya social contracts, harus difahami dan diperhalusi oleh semua kaum dengan sesungguh sungguhnya..oleh kerana sedia maklum dengan asal usul dan keturunan masing-masing.
Bukan dengan maksud untuk meremeh remehkan pada keturunan yang mendatang(dari tanah yang bukan serumpun dan sebangsa) juga tidak berbangga dengan kumpulan teras (asal dari tanah serumpun sebangsa)ianya harus diakui bahawa kumpulan teras berhak untuk menerajui satu2 kumpulan dan mempunyai tempat istimewa kerana disitulah mereka bermula dan memperjuangkan tanah tumpah darah tanpa berbelah bagi sedangkan keturunan yang mendatang sebenarnya mempunyai maksud dan tujuan hanya untuk bersama menumpang apa yang telah diperjuangkan dan bersama melorong jalan yang telah sedia ada..
mmm...secara umumnya alangkah bagus jika mereka tidak diadudombakan oleh mereka yang mempunyai agenda tertentu..demi kepentingan sendiri..
salam buat semua.
For what ever reasons, I'd be supporting you always.
Tak dapat tangkap lg apa Tun nk cerita dalam posting kali ni..looks like you've been steering away from commenting on the present 'hot gossips', but I always believe you always take the right step.
You are a great man.
May Allah bless you and your family with health, wealth, iman and the undying love to your own race.
Tun,
ANWAR DITUDUH LIWAT
Tidak ramai mengetahui fakta sebenar kes liwat Anwar Ibrahim. Mahkamah Rayuan memutuskan 2 lawan 1 untuk menolak pertuduhan terhadap Anwar atas sebab teknikal iaitu tarikh sebenar perlakuan itu tidak dapat dipastikan. Tetapi Mahkamah bersetuju dengan 3 lawan 0 bahawa perlakuan liwat itu memang terjadi.
Setelah sekian lama dibebaskan, mengapa apabila ada tuduhan baru, baru sekarang mahu membuat tuduhan konspirasi terhadap Peguam Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara?
ANWAR BERSEMBUNYI DI KEDUTAAN TURKI
Sebaik sahaja lapuran polis tudihan liwat dibuat, Anwar seperti dalam keadaan terkencing2 lari bersembunyi di kedutaan Turki (negara Islam sekular yang pro-Amerika). Alasan beliau, BEBERAPA MINGGU lalu beliau menerima ugutan bunuh. Tetapi selama waktu tersebut hingga sekarang beliau belum membuat lapuran polis.
Mengapa harus takut kalau tak bersalah? Mengapa harus bersembunyi kalau takut? Mengapa bersembunyi di 'Turki Amerika' tetapi tidak di tanahair sendiri?
Mahukan rakyat Malaysia terutama bangsa Melayu dan umat Islam menobatkan seorang yang dayus dan hipokrit seperti ini sebagai pemimpin kita?
Saya tidak berkata Anwar bersalah, tetapi tindak tanduknya menangani masalah sekecil ini pun menimbulkan pelbagai andaian dan keraguan yang amat sangat. Kalau nak buat political stunt pun, jangan lah stunt berlebih2an pulak, nanti orang dah tak percaya lagi!
Teringat akan budak kecil yang nakal dengan cherita serigala nya.
Secara ringkasnya.. setiap negara perlu ada asal usul penjaganya. Negara China di dominasi rakyat keturunan cina. Indonesia ada bangsa indonesianya. India ada orang indianya. Malaysia relevannya bangsa Melayunya.
Itu bukan racist. Itu ketuanan.
Brand of Malaysia. Melayu asal usulnya bangsa lain sebagai teman senegara. Hiduplah kita aman damai.
Sama-sama kita hidup aman damai.
Dearest Tun,
This is a very interesting article.
Many of us are aware of the existence of a Social Contract, but we have hardly sought to understand it and see its relevance and application in the Malaysian society.
This article is an eye-opener. I am quite sure that many will develop interest in studying this in greater depth.
Tun, you have always encouraged learning. Now you have turned into an educator.
Thank you and blessings from The Almighty.
Salam Tun,
1.Kenapa Ungku Aziz dakwa sosial kontrak tak wujud selama ini?
2.Apakah sebenarnya motif orang yang mendakwa perkara ini?
3.Apakah kelebihannya untuk rakyat dengan adanya atau tidak adanya sosial kontrak di teruskan sehingga kini?
Tq Sir
Jumanji, I think the issue with minority races is not about 'same rights' as it is about social equality. Even here in Britain, we have a minister who wants to draft new laws that makes it easier for women to get promoted ahead of men and for ethnic minorities to have advantages over their peer 'white' employees. Positive discrimination is recognised as a necessity in a lot of societies (even developed nations).
In terms of Malaysia, this necessity extends to the poor bumi putera. What the government needs to do is draw a fine balance between the needs of the poor bumi to the poor non-bumi. This is what I mean by social equality.
salam Tun , This is my first ever comment to you.Your comment supposed in regards to social contract come up from Pak Lah.It seems that the existing Premier is not doing his job .Every critical issue just being let go without answer.Every rationalist in Malaysia must work up plan that pull the premier down not because of personal interest but to the benefit of a nation.Thank Tun May Allah The Merciful bless u and your family
Semoga Tun dalam keadaan sihat sejahtera. Saya bertanya-tanya atas kebenaran yang berlaku kepada DSAI. Saya memihak kepada Tun biarpun kebenaran belum jelas dibuktikan.
Sekiranya DSAI benar, mengapa dia perlu takut dan berselindung.
Dia patut seperti Tun, berani menegakkan kebenaran.
Langkawi memberi sokongan pada Tun.
Salam Sejahtera.
Thanks Tun for again enlighten us on certain issues. Bila Tun dah menulis di Blog ini, banyak perkara dan ilmu yg saya dpt dan boleh buat penilaian. Pak Lah should have take you as his advisor rather than discriminate you totally. Baru dpt makmurkan lagi bangsa Melayu khasnya dan negara Malaysia yg tercinta ini.
Salam kepada Yang Amat Berbahagia Tun dan Toh Puan. The way I see it, we should not even begin talking about social contract just yet Tun. As things are in America, Australia and Indonesia, the immigrant had totally embraced their host country. In Malaysia on the other hand we still have the SRJKC and SRJKT education set-up. Why must anyone worry about losing their culture if they are sincere in wanting to make this country their country? Instead of merely a place to toil for some extra few pounds of gold (or whatever) before taking the steamer back home again for good to their motherland. The Malays have bent over backwards as far much as perhaps could. Look at America, is there even one single Negro Unified School District, or Polish Elementary School, or Hispanic Senior High School? I don’t think so. The once immigrants that had made America what it is today had totally embraced their host country bar none. Nearer to our shore, let’s look at Indonesia. Perhaps assimilation could never be fully realized on certain path and thats why we have a predominat race governing certain countries. Many countries in fact. To this, I conclude with HIDUP MELAYU! HIDUP TUN DR. MAHATHIR! - Kamal Ahmad Yahya
Salam Tun,
As usual I applaud your method of dissecting an issue. Straight to the point...seperti pisau tajam yang digunakan untuk pembedahan.
Bagaimana pula dengan isu Anwar Ibrahim?
Siapa Tipu Siapa?
http://umnodu.blogspot.com
Salam Tun,
Kontrak sosial atau the social contact adalah daripada dua perkataan iaitu kontrak dan sosial. Menurut kamus dewan kontrak bermaksud perjanjian antara dua pihak. Manakala sosial bererti kehidupan harian yang berkaitan budaya, politik, agama and so on....
Dalam hal kontrak sosial di Malaysia ini bolehlah disimpulkan bahawa kontrak sosial Malaysia ialah perjanjian sosial antara orang Melayu dengan orang Cina dan orang India yang menjadi rakyat Malaysia atas sebab tertentu seperti mereka tidak setia lagi dengan negara Cina dan India kerana dua negara itu dulu miskin dan banyak masalah alam semulajadi.
Oleh sebab kaum Cina dan India tdak lagi setia dengan negara mereka maka Inggeris tiada jalan lain menghantar mereka kembali kerana kos hantar amat tinggi. Inggeris ambil jalan mudah, paksa Melayu terima kaum Cina dan India jadi rakyat Tanah Melayu melalui konsep Jus Soli dengan cara sangat mudah.
Inggeris memang nak hantar pendatang Cina dan India balik negeri masing-masing. Diceritakan ada antara mereka sanggup gantung diri, ada sanggup bakar diri, ada sanggup lari ke hutan kerana tidak mahu balik semula ke Cina dan India.
Ada juga yang buat tunjuk perasaan pada kerajaan Inggeris. Mereka menjerit enggan balik ke negara asal. Keadaan menjadi sangat tegang. Inggeris segera berbincang dengan wakil sultan Melayu. Supaya masalah pendatang Cina dan India ini yang enggan balik ini dapat diselesaikan.
Melihatkan orang Cina dan India ini telah derhaka kepada negara sendiri, orang Melayu dan sultannya sangat bimbang jika mereka kelak jadi rakyat Tanah Melayu. Akhirnya orang Melayu dan Sultannya dapat ilham. Maka sebab itulah wujudnya " The Social Contract". Untuk mengelak Cina dan India belot.
Pada tahun 1969, berlaku peristiwa 13 Mei. Rusuhan kaum paling dahsyat. Setelah dibuat kajian, didapati kaum Cina menjadi besar kepala dan tidak mengenang budi orang Melayu. Mereka menang pilihanraya. Waktu itu DAP menang. Mereka berlagak.Besar kepala. Mereka mula pijak kepala orang Melayu. Sultan pun mereka tidak peduli.
Pada tahun 2008, berlaku pula rusuhan kaum India yang sangat ganas. Diketuai oleh gerakan Hindu. Dikenali HINDRAF. Mereka juga sudah besar kepala. Mereka mula menghina Melayu. Mereka hina sultan. Mereka fitnah. Agama Islam juga sama dihina.
Oleh itu..The Social Contract mesti dipatuhi. Mesti distruktur semula. Supaya harapan Sultan-Sultan Melayu dan orang Melayu ialah orang Cina dan India benar-benar menjadi rakyat Malaysia yang asli. Kalau boleh ikut cara negara Indonesia... Amerika Syarikat... China... India...sebab di negara ini juga ada kaum pendatang.
Sudah tiba masanya, Malaysia meniru Indonesia,AS, China, India untuk memantapkan kontrak sosial di Malaysia. Orang Melayu hendak, orang Cina dan India Malaysia berasa bangga apabila berbahasa Melayu. Macam orang Cina di Indonesia.AS.China.India. Dsb. Yang bangga berbahasa Indonesia.Inggeris.China.India...bla..bla..
Jika dapat, saya tidak mahu lihat lagi tulisan-tulisan Cina dan India di premis-premis kedai. Gantikan dengan Bahasa Melayu.atau Inggeris. Tiada lagi sekolah jenis Cina dan India....Tapi usaha ini sukar...mahu bertumpah darah nih...kecuali jika Melayu ni suka bertumpah darah....macam Israel...susah mau makan oooo....
Persoalannya...selagi ada DAP, MCA, Gerakan, MIC, PAS, dan PKR....usaha mewujudkan bangsa Malaysia akan menemui jalan sukar....politik Malaysia akan kacau bilau...rakyat hidup susah..saling curiga...bunuh sana...bunuh sini....pasal fanatik..
Oleh itu Kontrak Sosial mesti dipertahankan untuk kedaulatan raja-Raja Melayu....kedaulatan Islam....Daulat Tuanku...!!!! Daulat Islam....!!!!!
Oleh itu, UMNO tidak boleh dipimpin oleh pemimpin yang lemah, dayus, munafik, tidak pandai dan macam lalang....mengamalkan rasuah...
Oleh itu, parti pembangkang Melayu, khususnya PAS mesti satu suara dengan UMNO..tapi nampaknya PAS sudah hilang ke Islamannya....
PKR ni pulak....susah nak cakap...Mereka ni parti Islam ke tidak...??? Ishhh...Melayu apa PKR ni....???
sebenarnya bukan susah sangat nak faham kontrak sosial ni. bukan sikap kebodohan yang sukar dihapuskan untuk mendengar dan mengetahuinya, tapi keangkuhan dan sikap jumut untuk mendengar dan memahami semua yang dimaksudkan dengan kontrak sosial yang menyukarkan keadaan. berilmu tanpa mempunyai akal untuk memikirkan secara rasional memburukkan lagi keadaan. Perkauman bukan isunya, ketuanan melayu isunya. Adakah di negara india, kaum tamil sanggup memberikan kuasa kepada kaum melayu? adakah di china, kaum china sanggup memberikan kuasa memerintah kepada george bush.
Bukalah mata hati untuk memahami kontrak sosial ini, cukup mudah. Makan dan hiduplah dibumi malaysia ini, jadilah kaya manapun, tapi harus diingat, tuan tetap tuan. Jadilah tuan yang menjaga haknya, jangan sampai pendatang jadi tuan.
Salam sejahtera TUn serta keluarga,
Ini isu yang agak kritikal di waktu ini. Ramai merasa gusar membincangkan nya.
Well...My personal opinion is just that TUN membuka kelas ASAS Kemasyarakatan 101.
Teman-teman sekelian,
Kita harus berpandangan terbuka dengan isu ini...lebih lebih lagi ilmu yang diturunkan oleh pemimpin yang di hormati (kita ketepikan pembangkang tegar... dan ketepikan makhluk yang tak pernah puas dgn apa pun...kecuali pendapatnya sendiri)
He has been there and done that. 22 years... Rakyat Malaysia are happy lots. berkongsi kekayaan (Namun...masih ada juga merasakan kekayaan yang mereka ada tak cukup).
Para pelabur asing begitu yakin dgn kemesraan dan keharmonian rakyat Malaysia. Para pelabur yakin dengan usaha TUN. And the put the trust, dengan benar-benar melabur..bukan dengan kata manis janji di mulut sahaja.
Maka saya merasakan TUN yang paling layak menerangkannya.
The LIKE of Malay Dilemma.
Ini bukan masalah sape Tuan, sape kuli.
Tun Sir,
Dengan Izin Allah niat murni TUN akan diberkati.
Salam perjuangan.
Take good care of your health sir,
You are needed, STILL.
-Herotamil,mykmu.net
KES LIWAT ANWAR DAN SIFUL...
http://anwaribrahimdotcom.blogspot.com
BAIK PUNYA.......
Dear Tun,
My simple understanding is that our obligations towards our society. Meanning whatever our actions, we must think what will be the consequences towards our society. Then we must think whether we need to proceed with the action or not. :)
Tun, may Allah bless you and family. Please continue, I just cant wait for the second half. Thank you Sir !
P/S: Mr (or Miss) Antimamak is trying to take a ride on Tun's blog by trying to divert visitors to his/her blog. Nice try Mr! Thanks but no Thanks. I confess I visited his/her blog, but Antimamak's blog sucks! He even go to the extend that his/her kerani posted entries for him/her!
Tun:
-“Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible; but man’s inclination for injustice makes democracy necessary”.- Reinhold Niebuhr
-This quote could be an exhortation for people of faith to become involved in public life by giving a voice to those who are most
often left out of political processes.
- The nebulous state of its being (the social contract) is unfortunate. For uncertainty could be a driver of confusion and ultimately suspiciona and chaos. Upholding and enforcing the contract would only wors